Greetings,
"The Council on East Asian Community (CEAC) E-Letter" is delivered electronically bimonthly, free of charge, to readers in the world interested in Japanese thinking on an East Asian Community and other related international affairs by the Council on East Asian Community (CEAC), all-Japan intellectual platform for the study of an East Asian Community.
It will provide the global audience with our news on "CEAC Commentary" and "CEAC Updates."
If you wish to unsubscribe, please enter your email address in the "unsubscribe" box at the following link:
http://www.ceac.jp/e/e-letter-unsubscribe.htm
ITO Kenichi, Chairman, CEAC
WATANABE Mayu, President, CEAC
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"CEAC Updates"
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NEAT 31st Country Coordinators Meeting (CCM) and 17th Annual Conference (AC) in Tokyo, Japan held.
The Network of East Asian Think- tanks (NEAT) held its 31st Country Coordinators Meeting (CCM) and 17th Annual Conference (AC) in Tokyo, from August 22-23, 2019. The host was NEAT Japan : the Japan Forum on International Relations, and 49 specialists and experts representing different think tanks in the ASEAN+3 nations participated.
Two Working Groups (WGs) were held this year; "Networking Cultural Institutions for Socio-Cultural Connectivity in East Asia" sponsored by NEAT Korea, and "Towards Building a Sustainable Society in East Asia" sponsored by NEAT Japan. At the CCM, the results of the two WGs were reported, reviewed, then added onto the policy recommendation "NEAT Memorandum No.16."
The Memorandum, and the Reports of the WGs are available at the following links:
Policy Recommendation "NEAT Memorandum No. 16"
http://www.ceac.jp/e/pdf/neat/17wg_m16.pdf
NEAT Working Group Reports
1) Networking Cultural Institutions for Socio-Cultural Connectivity in East Asia (sponsored by Korea)
http://www.ceac.jp/e/pdf/neat/17wg_1.pdf
2) Towards Building a Sustainable Society in East Asia (sponsored by Japan)
http://www.ceac.jp/e/pdf/neat/17wg_2.pdf
"CEAC Commentary"
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"CEAC Commentary" presents views of members and/or friends of CEAC on an East Asian Community and other related international affairs. The view expressed herein is the author's own and should not be attributed to CEAC.
----------------- - - - -----------------
No.118
"US in Position to Persuade ROK to Accept Judicial
Proceedings"
By KURANISHI Masako
Political Scientist
According to a report of the Jiji Press, on recent deterioration of relationship between Japan and the Republic of Korea, a high-level governmental official of the United States issued the statement that both the governments of Japan and Korea were to be blamed for it evenly. It can be explained that the U.S. government fears the denial of the renewal of the General Security of Military Information Agreement (GSOMIA) by the government of the Republic of Korea, which was concluded between Japan and the Republic of Korea in order to confront the military threats of China, Russia and North Korea.
But it seems that the Republic of Korea should take the responsibility for it rather than Japan should. Because the recent intensification of mutual antipathy between Japan and the Republic of Korea was arisen from a series of judgments made by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Korea, by which the respondent Japanese companies were rendered to pay compensation to the Korean plaintiffs. This may be the reason why most of Japanese people were disappointed at the above-mentioned statement. Therefore, if the government of the U.S. intends to reconcile these two countries, the most proper and appropriate measure corresponding to this situation is to remind the government of the Republic of Korea of its obligation to observe the international law.
The U.S. was involved in this problem regarding the Agreement on the Settlement of Problems concerning Property and Claims and on Economic Co-operation between Japan and the Republic of Korea since the beginning in the first place. The U.S. government had played supporting role and had acted as intermediary in the process of the negotiations between Japan and the Republic of Korea until their diplomatic relations was normalized in 1965; on the 22nd June, 1965, Japan joined the Agreement.
In fact, during the negotiation period, each governments had often sought advices from the government of the U.S., whenever they hit a deadlock. On the whole, it seems that the U.S. stood by the Republic of Korea, because the Korean War ruined its land and impoverished Korean people considerably. In addition to that, the pro-Korean attitude of the U.S. might have been taken due to the participation of the force of the Republic of Korean in the Vietnam War considered.
After some rough going, a final word from the U.S. government ended this long-pending issue; the government of Japan could not help resigning any claims the Korean government and of its nationals. Furthermore, Japan supplied to the Republic of Korea 300 million USD in grants and extended the loans up to 200 million USD with obeying the Article I of the Agreement. This total amount of financial aids far exceeded that of the claims from the Korean side calculated on the basis of adequate or legal grounds. It is no exaggeration to say that the government of Japan compromised not with the Republic of Korea but rather with the U.S.
Looking over the past process of the negotiations, it is obvious that the U.S. took part in this negotiation with staying in the background and that the U.S. was a kind of 'alive witness' who had observed all the details; the real drafter of this Agreement might have been the government of the U.S. While Japan suffered from one-sided loss by this Agreement, the diplomatic normalization between Japan and the Republic of Korea in 1965 might be one of the fruits of the foreign or security policy of the U.S. in the Cold War era.
Therefore, the U.S. government must recognize well that both of the governments concluded this Agreement at that time on the condition that any claims from the Korean side, including unpaid wages of the requisition of labors, should "settled completely and finally," and any more contention should not be made from the Korean side after that; recently, so as to appeal this common consent, the government of Japan came to release a part of official documents into public as incontrovertible evidence for it.
This is the very reason why the U.S. should be in the position to require South Korea to follow the Agreement faithfully. And in this context, we hope that the government of the U.S. persuades the Republic of Korea positively to accept judicial proceedings, especially since the Article III stipulates setting up of an arbitration board as the measure for settlements of any disputes concerning the interpretation and implementation of the Agreement.
(This is the English translation of an article which originally appeared on the e-Forum "Hyakka-Somei (Hundred Ducks in Full Voice)" of CEAC on August 6, 2019, and was posted on "CEAC Commentary" on August 21, 2019.)
For more views and opinions in the backnumber of "CEAC Commentary," the latest of which are as follows, please refer to:
http://www.ceac.jp/e/commentary.htm
No.117 Another View on US-China Trade War by an
Overseas Chinese
by NAKAYAMA Taro, Adjunct Staff of a Nonprofit Organization
(June 12, 2019)
No.116 Younger Generation of Financially Insecure
Korea
Flee to Japan
by TAMURA Hideo, Journalist
(April 23, 2019)
No.115 Miscalculation on the Job Creation Effect from
the
TPP11
by KURANISHI Masako, Political Scientist
(February 22, 2019)
No.114 Japan Should Be Ready for
Head-on
Diplomatic Strife
by OKAMOTO Hiroaki, A overseas business owner
(December 21, 2018)
No.113 Pyongyang Joint Declaration Colored with
Sophism and
Uncertainty
by SAITO Naoki, Professor, Yamanashi Prefectural University
(October 23, 2018)
==================================================================
Please send your comments and/or questions to:
ceac@ceac.jp
To customize your subscription, or unsubscribe, please refer to:
http://www.ceac.jp/e/e-letter.htm
Officer in Charge: KIKUCHI Yona
The Council on East Asian Community
2-17-12-1301, Akasaka, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 107-0052
JAPAN
Tel: +81-3-3584-2193
Fax: +81-3-3505-4406