Greetings,
"The Council on East Asian Community (CEAC) E-Letter" is delivered electronically bimonthly, free of charge, to readers in the world interested in Japanese thinking on an East Asian Community and other related international affairs by the Council on East Asian Community (CEAC), all-Japan intellectual platform for the study of an East Asian Community.
It will provide the global audience with our news on "CEAC Commentary" and "CEAC Updates."
If you wish to unsubscribe, please enter your email address in the "unsubscribe" box at the following link:
http://www.ceac.jp/e/e-letter-unsubscribe.htm
ITO Kenichi
Chairman, CEAC
"CEAC Commentary"
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"CEAC Commentary" presents views of members and friends of CEAC on an East Asian Community and other related international affairs. The view expressed herein is the author's own and should not be attributed to CEAC.
----------------- - - - -----------------
No.101
"Reconsidering Significance of TPP
on the Occasion of the Current Extraordinary Session of the Diet"
By SUZUKI Keisuke
Member of the House of Representatives (LDP)
The autumn session of the Diet has started on September 26th. On that day, Prime Minister delivered a policy speech and Financial Minister delivered a financial policy speech respectively, which were followed by party representatives' questions on 27th and 28th. Among the issues to be discussed in the current Diet session, including economic fiscal stimulus package, postponing bill for consumption tax hike, IR promotion bill, one of the gravest would be the TPP Agreement and its related bills which were tabled at the previous session of the Diet.
At the spring Diet session, I stood at the forefront of the debate on TPP issues as a ranking member of TPP Special Committee and discussed the matter with Prime Minister at the Diet questioning as a member of the ruling coalition. In that capacity, I have strong reservations about the way in which then Democratic Party of Japan dealt with the issue in light of the national interest. I sincerely hope that the opposition party under the new dispensation will engage in ever more constructive discussions.
With regard to TPP, we need to revisit the strategic significance of it, as is true not only with Japan but also with the United States. First of all, TPP should be the biggest political bargaining chip to offset the negative impact of declining population in the context of the size of the Japanese market. The greatest challenge for Japan is population decline and certainly market and labor force will be directly affected. Besides, even if Japan looks toward broad free-trade zone, it is extremely difficult for Japan in the first place to create a free-trade bloc in the Asia-Pacific region in which Japan can demonstrate overwhelming leadership and influence. Realistically speaking, Japan has little choice but to be affected either by U.S. or by China.
Such being the case, given the Japanese social ethos, its legal system and its business environment, we would have to admit the United States have far more affinity for Japan than China does. This is apparently so when we look at such areas as intellectual property rights, dispute settlement, legal predictability. It is vital for Japan to take initiatives together with U.S. to develop a marketplace which has a high affinity for Japanese domestic legal system and its business environment, especially when it comes to promotion of Japanese economic growth.
Another point is strategic significance of TPP. It is highly probable that a free-trade block in Asia-Pacific including China will be established before long. In view of the national interest of Japan as well as regional stability, it is imperative that common rules with affinity for those of Japan and U.S. as well as common values such as rule of law and human rights lay the foundation for it. And this feeling is actually shared among many Asian countries.
For many Asian countries daunted by China's unilateral hegemonic imposition, participating in TPP led by Japan and the U.S. means a lot strategically. In addition, as the best scenario for the stability in the Asia-Pacific region, it is expected that the whole region would share such values as rule of law, human rights, freedom and democracy in the long run through participation in TPP as a leverage, and China would also participate in it under this condition.
Thus, TPP has many profound implications. Of course, TPP has its meaning as trade negotiations, it is unlikely that Japan will make an all-out victory in areas such as trade including tariffs. It is true that TPP negotiation will be accompanied by some pain, for each country with different economic structure engage in tough negotiation to get more than fifty-fifty split. However, we need to reaffirm the fundamental merits it has in terms of diplomacy, strategy and economy, which outweigh the negative aspects of it, and these negative aspects are to be duly addressed by domestic law properly.
In the previous Diet session, various points of discussions were conducted for more than twenty hours at the special committee of the House of Representatives. While the scope of the issue has already been covered thoroughly, it is expected that we reaffirm the significance of TPP and discuss additional points if any and make a decision. I think making such a constructive debate at the current Diet session would be the best way in pursuit of Japan's national interest.
(This is the English translation of an article which originally appeared on the e-Forum "Hyakka-Somei (Hundred Ducks in Full Voice)" of CEAC on 1 October, 2016, and was posted on "CEAC Commentary" on 31 October, 2016.)
----------------- - - - -----------------
For more views and opinions in the backnumber of "CEAC Commentary," the latest of which are as follows, please refer to:
http://www.ceac.jp/e/commentary.htm
No.100 China that once thrived on water, faces water problems today
by KODAMA Katsuya, President of Socially Responsible Investment
(15 October 2015)
No.99 A China is to Pay the Price for its Long-Overdue One-child Policy
by KODAMA Katsuya, President of Socially Responsible Investment
(22 April 2016)
No.98 A "Hell" for Putin is the Real Chance for the Russo-Japanese Territorial Talks
by SUGIURA Masaaki, Political Commentator
(28 April 2016)
No.97 Can Taiwan Depart from Economic Dependence on China ?
by KODAMA Katsuya, President of Socially Responsible Investment
(25 February 2016)
No.96 Great Implication of the US Navy's Action in the South China Sea
by SUZUKI Keisuke, Member of the House of Representatives (Liberal Democratic Party)
(28 December 2015)
====================================================================
Please send your comments and/or questions to:
info@ceac.jp
To customize your subscription, or unsubscribe, please refer to:
http://www.ceac.jp/e/e-letter.htm
Officer in Charge: KIKUCHI Yona
The Council on East Asian Community
2-17-12-1301, Akasaka, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 107-0052
JAPAN
Tel: +81-3-3584-2193
Fax: +81-3-3505-4406